martin28
Vocal Beginner
Offline
Posts: 5
Likes: 11
Join Date: February 2023
|
Post by martin28 on Dec 14, 2023 1:05:52 GMT
 Timothée Hal Chalamet (Born 27th December, 1995) Vocal Range: A2 - C5Significant High Notes:C5 ("You've Never Had Chocolate Like This")B4 ( "A Hatful of Dreams") F♯4 ("Pure Imagination") F4 ("You've Never Had Chocolate Like This") E4 ("A Hatful of Dreams", "A World of Your Own", "Giant Horse", "Pure Imagination", "Sister Golden Hair", "You've Never Had Chocolate Like This") Significant Low Notes:D3 ("A Hatful of Dreams", "Everything Happens to Me", "For a Moment", "You've Never Had Chocolate Like This") C♯3 ("You've Never Had Chocolate Like This") C3 ("Sorry, Noodle", "You've Never Had Chocolate Like This") B2 ("A World of Your Own", "Giant Horse", "Pure Imagination", "Tiny Horse") B♭2 ("Sorry, Noddle") A2 ("Pure Imagination") .......................................................
Blue marks falsetto or whistle notes.
Underlines mark notes that are obscured in the song mix.
Italics mark non-melodic notes.
Boldface marks notes that are considered to be particularly notable examples of this person's vocal capabilities. |
|
|
|
Post by Macca on Dec 14, 2023 1:21:32 GMT
Good first thread but some things to correct
1. You've got Vocal Range and Significant High Notes listed twice Just remove the top one and bold and underline his full name & change the bottom one that says Significant High Notes to Significant Low Notes
2. I'd start his highs at E4
3. Maybe add a space between the note names and the notes section for the D3, C♯3, C3, B2, D4 & B4
4. That B4 I'd italicize
5. The D5 i'd also italicize and it's a bit to brief and it's also a C5
6. It would be helpful to have this in your thread to show what each one represents
[font size="1"].......................................................
[font color="blue"]Blue[/font] marks falsetto or whistle notes.
[u]Underlines[/u] mark notes that are obscured in the song mix.
[i]Italics[/i] mark non-melodic notes.
[b]Boldface[/b] marks notes that are considered to be particularly notable examples of this person's vocal capabilities.[/font]
7. Add a questionable notes section if there's any other non-countable notes. Here's the code for it
[spoiler]{Questionable Notes}
[font size="1"].......................................................
[1] marks yelps and short trills in high range or anacrusis and short dips in low range.
[2] marks notes of questionable identity that cannot be confirmed to be the singer in question (mostly background lines that might be Ben Goldwasser because he sings them live, or they just don’t have enough of an Andrew vibe to them idk, but if Ben doesn’t sing them live I’m mostly assuming they’re Andrew).
[3] marks non-melodic notes that don't have a significant enough pitch to warrant inclusion.
[4] marks notes that possess uncertain pitch or have been pitch-shifted.
[5] marks notes that do not fit the previous criteria but are not of a substantial enough quality to warrant counting towards the singer's range.[/font][/spoiler]
|
|
martin28
Vocal Beginner
Offline
Posts: 5
Likes: 11
Join Date: February 2023
|
Post by martin28 on Dec 14, 2023 1:28:18 GMT
Good first thread but some things to correct 1. You've got Vocal Range and Significant High Notes listed twice Just remove the top one and bold and underline his full name & change the bottom one that says Significant High Notes to Significant Low Notes 2. I'd start his highs at E4 3. Maybe add a space between the note names and the notes section for the D3, C♯3, C3, B2, D4 & B4 4. That B4 I'd italicize 5. The D5 i'd also italicize and it's a bit to brief and it's also a C5 6. It would be helpful to have this in your thread to show what each one represents [font size="1"].......................................................
[font color="blue"]Blue[/font] marks falsetto or whistle notes.
[u]Underlines[/u] mark notes that are obscured in the song mix.
[i]Italics[/i] mark non-melodic notes.
[b]Boldface[/b] marks notes that are considered to be particularly notable examples of this person's vocal capabilities.[/font]
7. Add a questionable notes section if there's any other non-countable notes. Here's the code for it [spoiler]{Questionable Notes}
[font size="1"].......................................................
[1] marks yelps and short trills in high range or anacrusis and short dips in low range.
[2] marks notes of questionable identity that cannot be confirmed to be the singer in question (mostly background lines that might be Ben Goldwasser because he sings them live, or they just don’t have enough of an Andrew vibe to them idk, but if Ben doesn’t sing them live I’m mostly assuming they’re Andrew).
[3] marks non-melodic notes that don't have a significant enough pitch to warrant inclusion.
[4] marks notes that possess uncertain pitch or have been pitch-shifted.
[5] marks notes that do not fit the previous criteria but are not of a substantial enough quality to warrant counting towards the singer's range.[/font][/spoiler]Will fix all of these right now. Thank you for your feedback.  |
|
|
|
Post by Macca on Dec 14, 2023 1:43:22 GMT
Good first thread but some things to correct 1. You've got Vocal Range and Significant High Notes listed twice Just remove the top one and bold and underline his full name & change the bottom one that says Significant High Notes to Significant Low Notes 2. I'd start his highs at E4 3. Maybe add a space between the note names and the notes section for the D3, C♯3, C3, B2, D4 & B4 4. That B4 I'd italicize 5. The D5 i'd also italicize and it's a bit to brief and it's also a C5 6. It would be helpful to have this in your thread to show what each one represents [font size="1"].......................................................
[font color="blue"]Blue[/font] marks falsetto or whistle notes.
[u]Underlines[/u] mark notes that are obscured in the song mix.
[i]Italics[/i] mark non-melodic notes.
[b]Boldface[/b] marks notes that are considered to be particularly notable examples of this person's vocal capabilities.[/font]
7. Add a questionable notes section if there's any other non-countable notes. Here's the code for it [spoiler]{Questionable Notes}
[font size="1"].......................................................
[1] marks yelps and short trills in high range or anacrusis and short dips in low range.
[2] marks notes of questionable identity that cannot be confirmed to be the singer in question (mostly background lines that might be Ben Goldwasser because he sings them live, or they just don’t have enough of an Andrew vibe to them idk, but if Ben doesn’t sing them live I’m mostly assuming they’re Andrew).
[3] marks non-melodic notes that don't have a significant enough pitch to warrant inclusion.
[4] marks notes that possess uncertain pitch or have been pitch-shifted.
[5] marks notes that do not fit the previous criteria but are not of a substantial enough quality to warrant counting towards the singer's range.[/font][/spoiler]Will fix all of these right now. Thank you for your feedback. Also if you want to we usually use this format for the birth dates (BD Month YYYY - DD Month YYYY) |
|
auraldippinn
Vocal Beginner
Offline
Posts: 9
Likes: 4
Join Date: July 2024
|
Post by auraldippinn on Jul 14, 2024 3:20:10 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by motorist on Jul 14, 2024 7:19:05 GMT
For getting timestamped link at 0:47, remove everything after the ? and add t=47: youtu.be/o4HsERLv-iI?t=47{For embedding, I usually put the embedded video in a spoiler using like this to not take up too much page space. The video embed is "video", the video link, then "/video"; the spoiler containing that on the outside is "spoiler", curly brackets surrounding the spoiler title, the contents of the spoiler (video embed in this case), then "/spoiler". Press "quote" on the post to see the exact code.} That note sounds more like an G2 to me, though it's hard to tell. I would say it's uncountable due to being very breathy. |
|
auraldippinn
Vocal Beginner
Offline
Posts: 9
Likes: 4
Join Date: July 2024
|
Post by auraldippinn on Jul 14, 2024 14:34:34 GMT
For getting timestamped link at 0:47, remove everything after the ? and add t=47: youtu.be/o4HsERLv-iI?t=47{For embedding, I usually put the embedded video in a spoiler using like this to not take up too much page space. The video embed is "video", the video link, then "/video"; the spoiler containing that on the outside is "spoiler", curly brackets surrounding the spoiler title, the contents of the spoiler (video embed in this case), then "/spoiler". Press "quote" on the post to see the exact code.} That note sounds more like an G2 to me, though it's hard to tell. I would say it's uncountable due to being very breathy. you're a lifesaver man and it does have a bit of cadence (if almost unintelligible) around the G2 area. but slowing down the audio I can pick up a flash moment where he juuuuuust dips a bit after the G2. even if i'm supplemented with some decent earphones and good pitch discerning (which I am), either way I agree it's insufficient quality to count. still pretty cool that I managed to catch it tho 😌 |
|
