John Lennon (65,723 views)

[VocalDudeGuy]

Jul 20, 2024 0:05:33 GMT EddieCheivz said:

Jul 19, 2024 15:33:26 GMT bobby said:

Surely the G2 in I’m A Loser should be bolded. It sounds like it’s of equal quality to the one in Happiness Is A Warm Gun. He also hits it six times in I’m A Loser compared to just three times in Happiness Is A Warm Gun.

The amount of times the note is done doesn't matter at all, in fact if it's only one but being a really good one then it can amerite its bolding.

And personally I disagree, I find "Happinness is a warm gun" pretty good and hold on pitch strongly while the ones in "I'm a loser" sounds... very good IMO too but not so great for amerite its bold

I think if a note is done multiple times in short succession then that could contribute to a note or rather a pitch being bold worthy, but this of course depends on how wide the timeframe between the notes are.

[EddieCheivz]

If notes in question are not completely good for a bold then they won't be bolded, and that's all.
Nothing has been established here about notes that are given multiple times meriting so its bolding. We're labelling the standout or greatest notes, not the most predominant or constant ones

[VocalDudeGuy]

Jul 20, 2024 1:35:07 GMT EddieCheivz said:

If notes in question are not completely good for a bold then they won't be bolded, and that's all.
Nothing has been established never about notes that are given multiple times meriting so its bolding. We're labelling standout or greatest notes, not the most constant or lead ones

You are right that this technically would more so be impressive melodies than individual notes

[ellie]

There is absolutely precedent for bolding a particularly impressive passage even if the note in isolation isn’t the most impressive thing. Ditto for notes being hit multiple times in short succession. Frankly though I think someone should just take over this thread entirely and repost it than to continue to alter it from the original creators intention with regards to dubious countability of already included notes and altering of what notes are bolded.

[hendrix94]

I agree with you. It should be done again.

[ellie]

i dont think it needs to be redone necessarily I just think its weird to call it Holsety's thread while making those kinds of changes

[Homelander]

Jul 21, 2024 17:00:47 GMT ellie said:

I think someone should just take over this thread entirely and repost it

Agreed. I don't think it's productive to be constantly making little tiny edits to a thread that's already old, incomplete, and a little unorganized (no offense to the creator). A new user should remake this thread and go through all of the material, including what people have already submitted to the thread.

[Bink]

It's not really that incomplete or outdated. John Lennon didn't have a massive discography and the edits we are making are probably the most necessary we can make. Having a new user make a more so called "complete" version of the thread would essentially be nearly identical.

[Baronessa]

On the other hand I guess someone could just post it again with minimal fuss. It would at least be out of staff hands with an active user updating it.

The problem I'm seeing is that lots of people will most likely want to adopt it we're not going to let just anyone do that.

[EddieCheivz]

Jul 20, 2024 1:38:41 GMT VocalDudeGuy said:

Jul 20, 2024 1:35:07 GMT EddieCheivz said:

If notes in question are not completely good for a bold then they won't be bolded, and that's all.
Nothing has been established never about notes that are given multiple times meriting so its bolding. We're labelling standout or greatest notes, not the most constant or lead ones

You are right that this technically would more so be impressive melodies than individual notes

If they're the kind of cases I thinking of, these kind of vocal lines are already bolded on its respective threads on the sitie actually, cause as I said before they are enoughly great for do it. But once again, if notes (or line) in question are not completely awesome for a bold then won't be bolded.

However I don't think that's "I'm a Loser" case, personally

[ellie]

Jul 21, 2024 19:41:59 GMT Homelander said:

Jul 21, 2024 17:00:47 GMT ellie said:

I think someone should just take over this thread entirely and repost it

Agreed. I don't think it's productive to be constantly making little tiny edits to a thread that's already old, incomplete, and a little unorganized (no offense to the creator). A new user should remake this thread and go through all of the material, including what people have already submitted to the thread.

We are not in agreement

[Hennessy Macklemore III]

Jul 21, 2024 19:41:59 GMT Homelander said:

it's productive to be constantly making little tiny edits to a thread

Absolutely man, couldn't have said it better myself!

[queenfan11]

I personally would count the D5s at the end of "Mother". They're very distorted but hit the pitch pretty clearly.

[amadeusd]

Aug 4, 2024 3:46:41 GMT queenfan11 said:

I personally would count the D5s at the end of "Mother". They're very distorted but hit the pitch pretty clearly.

Yes. They are great. Not sure why they wouldn't be included. Then again, several other notes aren't included for other singers that are truly baffling so who knows.. 

[Hennessy Macklemore III]

Probably a leftover exclusion from TRP3

[hendrix94]

The D5s from Mother and John And Yoko should be included.

[EddieCheivz]

I propose this B♭4 from "Amsterdam" for a bold...

like 18 seconds, probably his longest note ever.

Also please check out at 23:08 John singing "Good Night" strong F2 that may also be boldworthy.